Former Peruvian president Alberto Fujimori was handed a 25-year jail sentence yesterday for his role in a handful of killings and kidnappings that took place during his time in office. The ruling came down from a three-judge panel around 9:30am, the culmination of an epic 15-month trial. The 70-year-old Fujimori said he will appeal the decision.
Fujimori, who was president from 1990 to 2000, remains an polarizing figure in Peru. One poll released Monday found 64% of Peruvians believe he was guilty of human rights crimes, while 72% believe he is guilty of corruption. When most people describe Fujimori as “guilty” or “innocent,” however, it has less to do with the specific facts of the case and more to do with offering judgment on the Fujimori years as a whole. The real polarizing question is: Did Fujimori go too far or did Peru’s chaos justify his actions?
The answer from abroad is and has been clear. Fujimori began drawing the ire of human rights groups as early as 1991, during his heavy-handed campaign to wipe out the Shining Path. Terrorists and innocents were executed without trial. He dissolved congress and the judiciary in 1992 and re-wrote the constitution in 1993 to allow himself a second five-year term.

All of this did not help his popularity among democracy-loving nations. Within the country, there remains a big rural/urban divide with comes to the Fujimori issue – it depends on how the 1990s treated you. Nearly all the Limeans I’ve asked come down on him hard. “Asshole,” says the bus driver. “My brother was thrown in jail as a terrorist in 1983,” says the woman buying a newspaper. “He should die in jail,” says the restaurant owner. Fancy eateries in the city’s Miraflores district sell post cards with a cartoon Fujimori, in prison-stripes, getting kicked to the slammer.
In the countryside, the story is different. Here, where the Shining Path threat was much more palpable and economic stability is needed for outright survival, Fujimori remains popular. In countless villages, crumbling brick houses have “Fujimori Innocente” painted in red and white letters, usually alongside “Keiko” – the name of Fujimori’s 33-year-old daughter, who is a popular congresswoman. Keiko Fujimori has said she will pardon her father of all crimes if she is elected president when she runs in 2011.
The most remote place I’ve heard Fujimori’s name come up was on a trip to the floating islands on Lake Titicaca, where Peru borders Bolivia. About 250 people still live on the islands, which are handmade from floating totora reeds. Nearly everything on the islands – the houses, boats, kitchen, tools – are made from the reeds. In the 1990s, Fujimori visited the islands twice, we were told. The president’s legacy here is not quashing terrorism or inviting foreign investment, but rather electricity. Fujimori and his people donated solar panels to the islands on their visit, which still stand today.
“Fujimori cares about us here. That is why we poor people support him,” our host Roberto said.
“El Chino”
Though his parents were Japanese immigrants to Peru, Fujimori’s nickname is “el Chino” or “the Chinaman.” “Chino” can be used either affectionately or derrogatively, serving as a catch-all for “East Asian.” Fujimori himself is said to have liked the moniker, though as a dark horse presidential candidate in 1989, he likely didn’t have much electoral room to dislike it too much. It certainly is catchier than a nickname like “la segunda generación japonés.”

More importantly, “chino” is a term loaded with associations for most Peruvians, many of them positive. “Chinos” are spendthrift shop owners, hard-working restaurant chefs. They have also been in Peru for 150 years. “Chinos” are just as legitimate to run for office as anyone else. Take the image of the “chinito de la esquina” (the little Chinese man on the corner) for instance. Here’s one recollection of growing up with the “Chinaman on the corner” from a Peruvian now in Australia. Translated (roughly):
Almost every neighborhood (in Lima) had its “Chinese Corner,” each with a picturesque character. The characteristics and habits of all of them were almost similar. The Chinaman at the corner could be identified by having a cigar in his mouth, a pencil in his ear, the cats, his credit book, scooping rice and sugar with khaki paper without spilling even one grain.
In reality, Fujimori was no shop owner nor chifa chef, but cultivating the “chino” image was especially useful given the time he arrived on the national scene in the late 1980s, Peru’s economy was in shambles with an annual inflation rate of more than 10,000% in 1990. Trust the Chinaman, he’s got his credit book.
Fujimori has been depicted many other ways as well. I’ve seen him as Christ, Satan, Blind Justice, a jail bird and a samurai, among other things. 
Barrios Altos, then and now
Barrios Altos is a poor and run-down district of Lima, east of the city’s center. On the night of November 3, 1991, members of the Grupo Colina – members of the Peruvian Armed Forces – killed fifteen people at a chicken barbecue suspected of being Shining Path rebels. The Colina were dressed completely in black and sprayed the neighborhood gathering for about two minutes. This incident, and Fujimori’s role it, was at the heart of the 15-month trial.
Yesterday afternoon, five hours after the sentencing, I found myself walking in Barrios Altos, a poor and run-down district of Lima, east of the city’s center. Narrow, treeless streets baking in the sun, graffiti, peeling paint and piles of trash in the street. I walked past Jirón Huanta, the site of the massacre (which I didn’t realize at the time).
Two blocks east of the site, at Plaza Buenos Aires, I examining a historic plaque when I was surrounded by six guys in their twenties. I knew immediately what was going to happen, and it only took twenty seconds. The group bolted down the residential alley. Relieved of money, camera, phone, voice recorder and backpack, I walked back where I came from to find the police. Regardless of who I talked to in the police station over the next few hours, the first response was always the same: “Well what were you doing there in the first place? Alone? Don’t you know it’s dangerous?”
Yes, then and now.
Images: JournalPeru, DustEyes blog